Timeline for Who are the first two viewers of a new question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:23 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 22, 2018 at 20:54 | comment | added | Charlie Brumbaugh | @ab2 If I wrote a huge answer like that and someone closed it, I wouldn't be very happy with them, especially if a mod single-handily did it. | |
| Jan 22, 2018 at 19:02 | comment | added | ab2 | @imsodin If you want to see just how much SE hates fun (and have some time), look at this question on ELU, which was recently locked as off topic. | |
| Jan 21, 2018 at 21:44 | comment | added | imsodin | I know SE hates fun, but does it need to hate fun that much? If anyone cares, here is the answer making this part of an official meme: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19478/the-many-memes-of-meta/… | |
| Jan 19, 2018 at 21:44 | comment | added | Sue Saddest Farewell TGO GL | Charlie, people are supposed to take your answers seriously. That's the purpose of answers! As I said before, you're extremely active on Meta, and responsible for bringing a lot of people here. These people don't need an answer like this. It doesn't teach them anything, which is our purpose for being on SE. Admitting you made something up should be reason enough to delete it, or at least the part that's not understandable to the average person. I can relate to posting when tired. That's why, after a good night's sleep, we can hit the delete button! | |
| Jan 19, 2018 at 15:31 | comment | added | imsodin | Vote this up not down - the factual part is correct and for the rest, at least after a quick glance at the tweet and following some links one should discover that this has become a meme (or if you don't care, just don't). | |
| Jan 19, 2018 at 6:22 | history | edited | Charlie Brumbaugh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 185 characters in body
|
| Jan 19, 2018 at 4:07 | comment | added | Sue Saddest Farewell TGO GL | Hi Charlie! Beyond "it's an auto viewer" I fail to see the use of this to visitors to our site. We don't need to see Jeff Atwood's Twitter page, and the link in it doesn't remotely address this question. The "Pluralization Bug" to which he refers is a Meta:SE post entitled Pluralization issues with counting a tag's top users page. Maybe this is an "inside joke" or something I'm missing, but meta's a public place. I'm surprised you did this, especially since you're a great contributor of quality content to our meta. | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 23:40 | vote | accept | ab2 | ||
| Jan 18, 2018 at 23:32 | comment | added | ab2 | I am sure there is a history behind this threat, but I don't really care what it is. I thought it might be an auto viewer, and thanks for the confirmation. | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 23:17 | history | answered | Charlie Brumbaugh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |